Re-writing the Right to Be Forgotten
January 11th, 2022
The Council of the European Union, the European Commission, and the European Parliament adopted the GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) to protect people’s personal data and privacy when visiting a website. Through the GDPR, websites are now required to disclose to users when cookies are employed to track their digital footprint and allow users to opt out. Most users find it cumbersome to complete the process and disregard the option. There is also regulation that grants users the “right to be forgotten,” enabling them to contact companies that collect, analyze, and sell their data and request that they be deleted from their databases.
The problem is that GDPR laws were not designed in the interest of the user but rather in the interest of the Big Tech giants: Google, Facebook, Amazon, Apple, and Microsoft. These key content providers and data collectors, along with many others, profit from the acquisition of user data. Google’s business model mastered the art of data collection. Facebook, Amazon, and Apple are following close in their footsteps. Microsoft, while a slightly smaller player in this arena, should not be overlooked for their influence in helping craft the GDPR.
Along with Big Tech, politicians have used the GDPR as a false cover to pretend they are concerned with digital privacy. If politicians really wanted to protect users’ digital data from Big Tech, the laws would have been crafted differently. The “right to be forgotten” has confusing loopholes and is nearly impossible for users to implement.
In order to be forgotten, a user must make a request to every individual company that collects data and ask to be removed. It’s a daunting task because there are so many companies who collect, analyze, and sell data. It’s almost impossible to track them all down. Even if one could contact all these companies, they are constantly generating new partners with whom they transfer user data. It’s a cat-and-mouse chase that has no end. This is insanity. If the laws were crafted with users’ privacy as the primary concern, they wouldn’t be called “the right to be forgotten,” but rather “the right to be remembered.”
Let’s pretend the GDPR laws allowed users the same, simple ability to opt out of being tracked as it currently does now to opt in with a single click. If this were the case, websites would never get any user information. Big Tech companies are not affected by GDPR regulations because so many people don’t care or simply don’t understand what’s at stake.